Module Technologies for Collaborative Work (TTC) invited us to understanding of social practices invent objects and at the same time, to consider whether the objects that constitute social practices.
writer Liliana Bodoc begins his novel "The African mirror " saying "There are objects that we will never fully belong. No matter whether of old family heirlooms, passed from hand to hand through generations. No matter if we receive a birthday gift or pay for them a lot of money ... the objectives are always a setback, a root that extends into other realities, a secret pocket. They are objects that can not clean corners or understand ... "Although
the writer refers to a mirror to read it, I thought about the many ways they acquire objects when we take possession of them, and obviously thought of ICT. As these technologies become extensions of our own body and that we "meaning" not only individuality but from our relationship with "others" from these quasi-objects. This mobile phone
sometimes serve to say "I can not talk now", the computer connected to the Internet and with your speakers turned on to give notice to each contact connected to each update that recognizes ... those objects that not only are there but "naturally" part of our actions. Objects that show a presence, a reality.
What kept secret pocket these technologies that surround us and allow us to experience a new lifestyle?
The way to do things we experience today is a "technological form of life" [1] , a way of life in which "communication" is the center of our actions, the condition that allows us to charge sense these objects with a behavior that has no limit in space or time. The immediacy is shaping our knowledge, we know communicating, appropriating a reality that same time, we build.
writer Liliana Bodoc begins his novel "The African mirror " saying "There are objects that we will never fully belong. No matter whether of old family heirlooms, passed from hand to hand through generations. No matter if we receive a birthday gift or pay for them a lot of money ... the objectives are always a setback, a root that extends into other realities, a secret pocket. They are objects that can not clean corners or understand ... "Although
the writer refers to a mirror to read it, I thought about the many ways they acquire objects when we take possession of them, and obviously thought of ICT. As these technologies become extensions of our own body and that we "meaning" not only individuality but from our relationship with "others" from these quasi-objects. This mobile phone
sometimes serve to say "I can not talk now", the computer connected to the Internet and with your speakers turned on to give notice to each contact connected to each update that recognizes ... those objects that not only are there but "naturally" part of our actions. Objects that show a presence, a reality.
What kept secret pocket these technologies that surround us and allow us to experience a new lifestyle?
The way to do things we experience today is a "technological form of life" [1] , a way of life in which "communication" is the center of our actions, the condition that allows us to charge sense these objects with a behavior that has no limit in space or time. The immediacy is shaping our knowledge, we know communicating, appropriating a reality that same time, we build.
Alone? Of course not, we do "other" with those "significant others" than before (not long ago, only 10 years ago) set up this group of people that we relacionábamos in a few areas, face to face: family, school, work, club ...
But this S. XXI's "significant others", those with whom we are building the reality they may be right here beside us, or may be thousands and thousands of miles away. And we need, because as relational beings, we are in and with others. Remember
But this S. XXI's "significant others", those with whom we are building the reality they may be right here beside us, or may be thousands and thousands of miles away. And we need, because as relational beings, we are in and with others. Remember
that the reality of everyday life is an intersubjective construction, a shared world, which implies interaction and communication processes through which we share with others and experience to others. [2]
Facundo Cabral sings: "... born to meet: Life is the art of meeting ... This is the fundamental revolution, the constantly revving to harmonize with the life that is constantly changing, we meet so fatally to illuminate every corner ... "
But if we are so connected to each other, if our heart is confirm each other, why boredom? Why some call this era "the era of empty"?
"There is no doubt that a life without an assumption about reality - that is, without a sense, is unbearable. Boredom is the most subtle form of fear and emptiness. Hence our constant search for meaning. " [3]
For this reason, live "entangled" and "connected" is starting to give meaning to reality together through collaborative work conscientiously to help us think of networking. Supposed to go interweaving our knowledge to address the inequalities that emerge from the Chartered Society trademark, copyright prototypes.
Because, beyond the characteristics that present the applications of Web 2.0 and that open new vistas and opportunities, there is great need for these applications are not monopolized by only a few sectors.
That's it, then try a distributed knowledge, to be adding and multiplying outbreaks links on our own networks, which do not cease to be a node other larger networks.
bored not mean stop being simply technology users to mingle and prolonged through them getting used to "do together."
course not be easy ... As education professionals we know there is a long way to go.
important thing to understand is that this plethora of tools now offers Web 2.0 (and Web 2.1 ) can be reconstructed and co-constructed from the emerging needs of our social practices.
But if we are so connected to each other, if our heart is confirm each other, why boredom? Why some call this era "the era of empty"?
"There is no doubt that a life without an assumption about reality - that is, without a sense, is unbearable. Boredom is the most subtle form of fear and emptiness. Hence our constant search for meaning. " [3]
For this reason, live "entangled" and "connected" is starting to give meaning to reality together through collaborative work conscientiously to help us think of networking. Supposed to go interweaving our knowledge to address the inequalities that emerge from the Chartered Society trademark, copyright prototypes.
Because, beyond the characteristics that present the applications of Web 2.0 and that open new vistas and opportunities, there is great need for these applications are not monopolized by only a few sectors.
That's it, then try a distributed knowledge, to be adding and multiplying outbreaks links on our own networks, which do not cease to be a node other larger networks.
bored not mean stop being simply technology users to mingle and prolonged through them getting used to "do together."
course not be easy ... As education professionals we know there is a long way to go.
important thing to understand is that this plethora of tools now offers Web 2.0 (and Web 2.1 ) can be reconstructed and co-constructed from the emerging needs of our social practices.
The image that illustrates this posting was taken from Petrolart's Blog
[1] Lash, Scott. Critical information. Buenos Aires, Amorrortu, 2005
[2] Berger and Luckmann. The social construction of reality. Amorrortu, 2001
[3] Watzlawick, Paul - The nonsense of sense. Barcelona, \u200b\u200bHerder, 1995
0 comments:
Post a Comment